I dont find that it changes the fundamental character of the original recording at all.I just understood the audio of án AKG and á Shure and bóth sounded pretty genuine to me.What is your oppinion ón this pIug-in (if ány of you used it before) If it actually does exactly what it says then there would end up being no want to purchase all those expesive mics.Having simply one that they have got the printing for would emulate all the some other.
The Antares group says theyll emulate ány mic if thé proprietor is prepared to send it to them for 5 days. Furthermore, I have a issue for Alan Hyátt: would you consider sending Antares the Chemical1. The concept of digital sound running (DSP) is only as good as the signal chain. On a 1,000 stereo, for instance, the Antares may in fact create an SM58 sound very a bit like a Neumann U 67. The concept breaks down when you get into high-end saving and play-back systems. At a specific degree, you dont wish to hear ANYTHING thats happen to be performed to the musical technology information. The manipulation that improved the audio on a thousand dollar stereo significantly degrades the audio of a 10,000 stereo. So within its limitations, the Antares will be a great application of DSP. However, purchasing a Studio room Projects G-1 for 229 shipped isnt the exact same as trying to make an SM58 sound like a Neumann U87awe. Instead, the C-1 emulates the actual and digital features of the even more expensive mic, producing a audio that is usually NOT the same, but may have got some likewise pleasing general qualities. These symbolize two totally different paradigms. The one purports to appropriate deficiencies in the signal by manipulating the audio in the digital domain. But to my ear canal, when I use it, it can end up being a great tool to heated up my singing if it sounds a bit cold.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |